The latest questionnaire contained 3 bits. Region We integrated questions off socio-demographic investigation (decades, amount of knowledge, parity, familial earnings, field, most recent marital updates, sexual pastime, reputation of HPV vaccination, and you may reputation of unpredictable cervical malignant tumors testing).
Region II composed of six questions regarding the mark women that will likely be processed, years to begin with, frequency, ages or standards to avoid off tests, and methods out of evaluation. Just the participants who’d have you ever heard out of HPV manage go ahead in order to Region III which analyzed information about HPV off their types of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), setting off indication and you can reduction.
Before the investigation, the fresh questionnaire out-of area II and you will part III in the Thai adaptation were considered, discussed, and you may modified until opinion one of 20 boffins have been all gynecologic oncologists (some was authors in other synchronous studies). The experts ranked each of 19 inquiries since often ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The thing-peak Content Validity List (I-CVI) is actually computed for each goods, therefore the Stuff Validity Directory (CVI) is actually calculated by taking the common proportion off fourteen questions regarding information about cervical cancer screening and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. The CVI was indeed step 1 for elements of new survey (S1 Table). New precision was checked inside the 30 women with the exact same trait since players. New Cronbach’ alpha coefficients on the accuracy was in fact 0.819 to have understanding of cervical cancers testing and 0.907 getting knowledge about HPV.
Investigation collection
Toward day out-of arranged colposcopy, the study assistant given guidance of your own analysis on female whom satisfied addition criteria. The ladies who wanted to engage offered composed informed consent and you hotteste vietnamesisk pige will responded the new questionnaire separately by themselves in advance of proceeding in order to colposcopy.
Data obtained because of it data was indeed socio-market analysis (Area We of one’s survey), experience with cervical disease evaluating (Region II), and experience in HPV (Region III).
Analytical analysis
The answers of knowledge on cervical cancers assessment and HPV was indeed reviewed by for every goods ahead of scoring categorization. Proper answer are scored as 1 whereas ‘wrong and being unsure of answer’ was scored 0.
Off fourteen questions off cervical malignant tumors testing, female whoever get was in fact ? ten had been arbitrarily classified due to the fact with ‘a great knowledge’ if not were thought to be having “bad training”. Getting experience in HPV, women whoever answer try ‘never ever heard of HPV’ was in fact omitted on the data from HPV studies.
Out of 5 questions, female whoever score have been ? 3 was basically regarded as which have ‘a experience in HPV’ normally as the ‘not good knowledge’. From 19 questions, feminine whose score had been ? 13 have been categorized as the that have ‘a great complete knowledge’ usually since the ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.
All of the studies were amassed within the a digital databases and reviewed having fun with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic analysis and you may was basically described once the amounts with percentage, suggest with basic departure otherwise average which have range. The new relationship between for every single changeable and you can degree get was basically reviewed using effortless linear regression. Exploratory design was made within the multivariable research including most of the parameters possibly related to the content rating. The new thought amount of mathematical advantages are a p-property value 0.05 otherwise smaller.
Efficiency
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>